<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Daily National - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-245af50c" type="application/json"/><link>http://dailynational.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://dailynational.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:08:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Who Won The NBC News Florida Republican Debate?</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2012/01/24/who-won-the-nbc-news-florida-republican-debate/#comment-419351191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;GINGRICH DID NOT WIN!!!  In fact he finished dead last!!  He could not defend himself effectively on his ouster as Speaker, ethics complaints, money from Freddie or any other thing.  He has got far more Pinocchio's than any other candidate following every debate and no doubt this one as well.  Those too young to know and remember all his ridiculous statements and his alienation of all his colleagues don't know the facts and should study and learn the truth!!!!!  Romney won in a landslide and was forced to resort to tactics he does not prefer but if you are in the hog pen with pigs you can't avoid the mud!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ALSW</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:08:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Won The NBC News Florida Republican Debate?</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2012/01/24/who-won-the-nbc-news-florida-republican-debate/#comment-419346464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ron paul won, and this is obvious if you just took a glance at all the other polls. It's pretty obvious...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndrewPayment</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:55:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can we pay respect to Joe Paterno?</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2012/01/22/can-we-pay-respect-to-joe-paterno/#comment-419201877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kristyfrommi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:03:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Everything you need to know about Ron Paul</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/23/everything-you-need-to-know-about-ron-paul-3/#comment-407120385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the white supremicist website stormfront officially endorses ron paul as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/12/28/founder-of-stormfront-openly-endorses-ron-paul-says-paul-shares-their-views-video/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.addictinginfo.org/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Howard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:16:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Anti-Romney Ad</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/11/30/new-anti-romney-ad/#comment-395064591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Visit &lt;a href="http://IamMittRomney.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;IamMittRomney.com&lt;/a&gt;.  Hook up with them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Xultant</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:18:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here is Everything You Need to Know About the Typical Ron Paul Supporter</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/18/here-is-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-typical-ron-paul-supporter/#comment-394607660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, Ron Paul is getting a good share of media coverage now . Unfortunately it's all  hit pieces out of fear that he may actually take Iowa. Not like your hit pieces that aim at discrediting all his supporters instead of the candidate. It's nice to see that some of America is waking up to the Mainstream Media games.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Walker</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 17:22:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul&amp;#8217;s misguided  media anger</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/22/ron-pauls-misguied-media-anger/#comment-393296130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Accused of what? If you started a company that published wildly racist ides with your name on it and you grossed more than a million dollars, you had better be prepared to answer questions about it if you run for office.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:10:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Everything you need to know about Ron Paul</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/23/everything-you-need-to-know-about-ron-paul-2/#comment-393295200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They weren't even allowed to be full church members until a few years before that. I believe that is because they weren't considered to possess souls.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:08:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Everything you need to know about Ron Paul</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/23/everything-you-need-to-know-about-ron-paul-2/#comment-393160218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's ask Romney why according to the Mormon Church Black people were not allowed to have the priesthood until 1978.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JagerHitsULater</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:22:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul&amp;#8217;s misguided  media anger</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/22/ron-pauls-misguied-media-anger/#comment-392667332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would get angry if I were being accused of something of that degree..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Non</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:37:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Anti-Gingrich Ad Ever&amp;#8211;From Ron Paul</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/14/best-anti-gingrich-ad-ever-from-ron-paul/#comment-389866521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When you say Ron Paul is the only choice you insult the 90 to 95 percent of the world who favors either Obama or another Republican candidate. Every Ron Paul supporter I have encountered seems to think that if they just insult and berate voters and the media and call them stupid for not supporting Paul, then everyone will magically start supporting Paul. Sadly for you, it doesn't work that way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:40:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Anti-Gingrich Ad Ever&amp;#8211;From Ron Paul</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/14/best-anti-gingrich-ad-ever-from-ron-paul/#comment-388096309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's wrong with you hard headed pundits? As usual, Ron Paul kicked ass yet again. Why do you think he CAN'T win? We have a despot in the White House and the Congress doesn't seem to have any problem with creating a police state here in America. Do you really think that a nation founded on the ideas of Thomas Jefferson is going to stand for it? Paul is not only the best choice to win, he's the ONLY reasonable choice for anyone who believes in freedom. So you media types can follow your access-granting republicrats to the grave, but the fact of the matter is that the public is close to revolting against this government. Ron Paul may be the only one who can restore sanity, sound money, decent foreign policy, and prosperity in a TRULY free market. We WILL end the status quo. Get with it, media! RON PAUL 2012!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Coolstyling</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:35:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2012: End of the World or Beginning of the Breach Era?</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/06/2012-end-of-the-world-or-beginning-of-the-breach-era/#comment-385238360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great advice, and will be looking into a few charges I had un unit now not bothered to follow up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Myhealth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:13:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-382479221</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You and your backers are the worst kind of cowards.  Choosing between one of the cannibals for chief won't save you from being dinner.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">invictus2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:18:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-382369630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Any vote for the GOP or a corpocrat is the sign of a zombie brain.  You don't avoid being cannibal dinner by supporting one of the cannibals for chief.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">invictus2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-382275318</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's the GOP message that is weak and false.  Anyone that votes for it in any form, or for any representer of it is a zombie lizard brain.  Eating sh*t does not make you a pollution expert or a wiseman.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">invictus2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:43:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-382139432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Invictus2, certainly you do recognize that there is such a thing as a Democrat in the world, right? Can't you imagine that we wold prefer to run against the weakest possible Republican candidate? Who would that be, in your view?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:36:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-381448330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"help them pick their weakest leader" is just another GOP meme con!  The Luntz's and Roves and their bought and paid for think tanks flood the media with this crap!  Distract, deflect, muddle.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">invictus2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:07:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-381422757</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do you hate America so much?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:30:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-381421926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Floyd, you sound like you are writing a letter of recommendation for me to work on the Gingrich Communications staff. Sorry, I'm not interested.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-381398405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree Gingrich as a nominee would have a chance, but that doesn't mean it isn't a lower chance then another Republican who isn't a complete idiot. Why shouldn't we do all in our power to help our changes? surely not every single GOP candidate has an equal chance, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-381397166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Republicans are so bad (and I agree) then why not do everything in your power to stop them? What better way to weaken them than to help them pick their weakest leader who would send them to defeat?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-381395944</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is always the danger that Gingrich cold be arrested, but he is such a disaster as a human being that he would likely spend all of his time as president chasing book deals and interns, so I doubt he'd do much harm.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:53:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-381394797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;calling names? Like "sick, pathetic, decayed?" Oh wait, those are all words Frank Luntz told Gingrich and all Republicans they had to use when talking about Democrats.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newt Gingrich for President! – The Liberal Democratic Perspective</title><link>http://dailynational.com/2011/12/02/newt-gingrich-for-president-%e2%80%93-the-liberal-democratic-perspective/#comment-381393721</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wasn't it the other way around?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Daily National</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:49:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
